Well Meg, I didn't vote for you because the only issue we agree on is .... oh yeah, nothing. And frankly, I think your spending of over $88 million dollars to buy your way into the Governor's Mansion tells me that you have no problem "spending" money. I doubt you care where the money comes from, as long as you can spend it on whatever you want. Unfortunately for California, you might be the lesser of two evils in the upcoming battle for Governor of the great State of California, and I will probably cast my vote for you. Although I really question whether there is much difference in the political leaning of both you and Jerry Brown, I can only believe you support the Global Warming Fraud and Cap & Trade because you have investments that benefit from "dealing with the problem." Jerry Brown is just a nut case, while I think you're just an opportunist. A nut case will never change their mind, but an opportunist might listen to reason. However, I could actually vote for you in good conscience if you had a show of good faith. And here is my proposal:
I know the budget for your upcoming campaign must be at least several $100 million. So, you make ONE great commercial, and that's it. In this commercial, you tell the citizens of California that you're so committed to really fixing the State, that you spent $10 million dollars on the commercial and airtime (or whatever the cost would be) and the rest of your budgeted campaign money will be donated to the State's general fund to put toward the State's deficit. How about it Meg....do you really care about California? Prove it! Put your money where your mouth is!
This is a great plan that I'm sure would endear you to countless voters, and best of all, everyone wins.
Thursday, June 10, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)